AI SDLC Consulting

Loop engineering for AI development

Coding assistants and agents are fast, but speed without a method creates rework. We design the loop your engineers and AI tools work in - plan, generate, review, test, refine - with clear hand-offs, guardrails and review gates, so AI output is something your team can trust and ship.

A circular development loop with five stages, one highlighted in orange to mark the human review gate

Who this is for

For teams that adopted AI tools and now need a way of working

Most teams start with individual developers trying assistants on their own. Results vary, review load grows and nobody is sure which output can be trusted. Loop engineering turns that into a shared, repeatable practice.

Engineering leaders rolling out coding assistants or agents

You want consistent results across teams, not a handful of power users and a lot of uncertainty.

Teams where review has become the bottleneck

Pull requests are bigger and arrive faster than reviewers can read them with confidence.

Regulated or security-sensitive products

Healthcare, fintech and retail teams that need traceability for what AI produced and who approved it.

What we do

We design the loop, then run it with you

Each engagement is shaped around your codebase, tools and risk profile. Typical activities include:

Map your current workflow

We observe how work moves from ticket to production today and where AI tools already sit in it, including the unofficial ones.

Design the human-AI loop

Define each stage - plan, generate, review, test, refine - with who (or what) does it, the inputs it needs and the definition of done.

Set guardrails and review gates

Decide where a human must approve, which paths are off-limits for agents, and how secrets, data and licences are protected.

Engineer the context

Structure repository conventions, architecture notes and task briefs so models get the right context and produce less noise.

Right-size the hand-offs

Keep AI-generated changes small and reviewable, with commit and pull-request conventions that make provenance visible.

Measure what changes

Agree a few signals - cycle time, review effort, escaped defects, rework - and track them before and after so decisions rest on evidence.

What you get

Practical artefacts your team keeps using

Everything is written for your engineers, stored in your repositories and owned by you.

  • Loop playbook. a short, versioned description of each stage, its owner, inputs and exit criteria.
  • Guardrail policy. where agents may and may not act, approval rules and data-handling limits.
  • Context pack. repository instructions, architecture summaries and task templates tuned for your tools.
  • Review checklist. what reviewers look for in AI-generated changes, ordered by risk.
  • Baseline and target metrics. a simple dashboard or sheet with the signals agreed above. [TBD: metric]
  • Rollout plan. how the loop moves from the pilot team to the rest of engineering.

How it works

From first workshop to a working loop in weeks, not quarters

Step 01

Discover

Interviews, workflow mapping and a look at recent pull requests to see where AI helps and where it hurts.

Step 02

Design

We draft the loop, guardrails and context pack with your tech leads and agree the metrics to watch.

Step 03

Pilot

One team runs the loop on real work while we pair with them, tune the playbook and remove friction.

Step 04

Scale

We hand over the playbook, train the next teams and set a review cadence so the loop keeps improving.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Ready to make AI output trustworthy?

Tell us how your team uses AI tools today and we will suggest a practical first step.